Pattishall IP Blog

February 16, 2010

Defamatory "Tweet" Complaint Dismissed

Filed under: First Amendment, Internet — Tags: , , — Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP @ 5:43 pm

By Alexis Payne, Esq.

On January 27, 2010, the Circuit Court of Cook County dismissed a property manager’s defamation claim against a disgruntled tenant over a Twitter post.  The tenant, Amanda Bonnen, posted the following “tweet”[1] on Twitter to vent her frustration with Horizon Realty, her property manager: “Who said sleeping in a moldy apartment was bad for you?  Horizon realty thinks it’s okay.”  Horizon Realty alleged it sustained $50,000 in damages as a result of the disparaging post, despite the fact that Ms. Bonnen’s Twitter account only had twenty followers.[2]

Ms. Bonnen filed a motion to dismiss the case, contending that her tweet statement was not a verifiable fact and instead was merely her opinion.  In an unpublished opinion, Judge Diane Larson agreed, finding that “the tweet was non-actionable as a matter of law,” and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.

The court’s ruling raises important questions about how cases involving disparaging posts on Twitter may be handled going forward and how courts may apply the law of defamation in the realm of social media.

Although tweets may be capable of defamatory meaning in certain contexts, the ruling in this case reinforces the axiom that fleeting statements, including those made in social media, that are critical of others will not invariably be actionable in court.  Nonetheless, there are certain statements, including allegations of criminal activity and dishonesty in business, that the law automatically assumes cause actionable harm.  Thus, those who post tweets and other commentary in social networks must be aware of the risks in doing so.

A copy of the complaint is available here.

*   *   *

Alexis Payne is an attorney with Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP, a leading intellectual property law firm based in Chicago, Illinois.  Pattishall McAuliffe represents both plaintiffs and defendants in trademark, copyright, and unfair competition trials and appeals, and advises its clients on a broad range of domestic and international intellectual property, advertising, and media matters, including brand protection, Internet, and e-commerce issues.  Pattishall McAuliffe also counsels clients on defamation, invasion of privacy, and other matters involving the First Amendment.  Ms. Payne’s practice focuses on advertising, promotional marketing, media, First Amendment, and intellectual property law.

 

 


[1] For those unfamiliar with Twitter and its vernacular, a “tweet” is a post on the Twitter social network that consists of 140 characters or less.

[2] Only Ms. Bonner’s “followers” – people who sign up to receive updates from the person followed – received her tweets.

 

 

For a printer-friendly version, click here.

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: