<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pattishall IP Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pattishall.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pattishall.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:47:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='blog.pattishall.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://blog.pattishall.com/osd.xml" title="Pattishall IP Blog" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://blog.pattishall.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>The FTC Issues Revised Guidance for Mobile Device and Social Media Advertising Claims</title>
		<link>http://blog.pattishall.com/2013/04/25/the-ftc-issues-revised-guidance-for-mobile-device-and-social-media-advertising-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.pattishall.com/2013/04/25/the-ftc-issues-revised-guidance-for-mobile-device-and-social-media-advertising-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard &#38; Geraldson LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission (FTC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phillip Barengolts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pattishall.com/?p=1675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Phillip Barengolts, Partner On March 12, 2013, the Federal Trade Commission issued revisions to its digital advertising guidelines, “.com Disclosures: How to Make Effective Disclosures in Digital Advertising” (the “Guides”).[1]  The Guides do not break new ground, but they provide advertisers with valuable examples of compliant disclosures that qualify advertising claims appearing on mobile [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.pattishall.com&#038;blog=14106647&#038;post=1675&#038;subd=pattishall&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.pattishall.com/2013/04/25/the-ftc-issues-revised-guidance-for-mobile-device-and-social-media-advertising-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/f6942e38b9535efb49140710f026d815?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">pattishall</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://pattishall.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/pb-lr.jpg?w=100" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">PB LR</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trademark Board Confirms That New York Yankees Are Evil</title>
		<link>http://blog.pattishall.com/2013/04/11/trademark-board-confirms-that-new-york-yankees-are-evil/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.pattishall.com/2013/04/11/trademark-board-confirms-that-new-york-yankees-are-evil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard &#38; Geraldson LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TM Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet A. Marvel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Yankees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TTAB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pattishall.com/?p=1671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Janet Marvel, Partner As a life-long Chicago Cubs fan, I am pleased to report that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) has held that the New York Yankees are known as the &#8220;Evil Empire&#8221; and therefore, a third party using that term would create confusion as to source or sponsorship. In New York [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.pattishall.com&#038;blog=14106647&#038;post=1671&#038;subd=pattishall&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.pattishall.com/2013/04/11/trademark-board-confirms-that-new-york-yankees-are-evil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/f6942e38b9535efb49140710f026d815?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">pattishall</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court&#8217;s Wiley Gray Goods Decision Does Not Foreclose Trademark Options Against Gray Market Goods</title>
		<link>http://blog.pattishall.com/2013/03/19/supreme-courts-wiley-gray-goods-decision-does-not-foreclose-trademark-options-against-gray-market-goods/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.pattishall.com/2013/03/19/supreme-courts-wiley-gray-goods-decision-does-not-foreclose-trademark-options-against-gray-market-goods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 21:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard &#38; Geraldson LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gray Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Sale Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan S. Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pattishall.com/?p=1661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Jonathan S. Jennings, Partner The U.S. Supreme Court decided today that copyright law would not protect against most gray market works.[1]  It is important to remember, however, that U.S. federal and state trademark and unfair competition laws still provide effective remedies against the importation, sale and distribution of gray market goods. In most cases, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.pattishall.com&#038;blog=14106647&#038;post=1661&#038;subd=pattishall&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.pattishall.com/2013/03/19/supreme-courts-wiley-gray-goods-decision-does-not-foreclose-trademark-options-against-gray-market-goods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/f6942e38b9535efb49140710f026d815?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">pattishall</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://pattishall.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/jsj_lowres.jpg?w=100" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jsj_lowres</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hear This:  Court Denies Motion for Summary Judgment in Dispute over Headphone Trademarks Between Dolby Labs and Monster, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://blog.pattishall.com/2013/01/31/hear-this-court-denies-motion-for-summary-judgment-in-dispute-over-headphone-trademarks-between-dolby-labs-and-monster-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.pattishall.com/2013/01/31/hear-this-court-denies-motion-for-summary-judgment-in-dispute-over-headphone-trademarks-between-dolby-labs-and-monster-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 20:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard &#38; Geraldson LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey A. Wakolbinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pattishall.com/?p=1631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Jeffrey A. Wakolbinger From a dispute involving trademarks used in connection with headphones, we are reminded how inherently difficult it is to defeat a likelihood-of-confusion claim on summary judgment. I.   The Parties Monster, Inc., is a consumer electronics company, which sells a variety of goods to musicians and home-audio enthusiasts in connection with the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.pattishall.com&#038;blog=14106647&#038;post=1631&#038;subd=pattishall&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.pattishall.com/2013/01/31/hear-this-court-denies-motion-for-summary-judgment-in-dispute-over-headphone-trademarks-between-dolby-labs-and-monster-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/f6942e38b9535efb49140710f026d815?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">pattishall</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://pattishall.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/jaw.jpg?w=104" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">JAW</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://pattishall.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/monster31.jpg?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Monster3</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://pattishall.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/dolby.jpg?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Dolby</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://pattishall.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/headsets.jpg?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Headsets</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Air Force 1 trade dress dispute held moot – Nike wins at Supreme Court, but at what cost?</title>
		<link>http://blog.pattishall.com/2013/01/11/air-force-1-trade-dress-dispute-held-moot-nike-wins-at-supreme-court-but-at-what-cost/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.pattishall.com/2013/01/11/air-force-1-trade-dress-dispute-held-moot-nike-wins-at-supreme-court-but-at-what-cost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard &#38; Geraldson LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Dress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Covenant Not To Sue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mootness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uli Widmaier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pattishall.com/?p=1619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Uli Widmaier A sues B for infringing its registered mark.  B counterclaims for cancellation of A&#8217;s registration.  A executes a comprehensive covenant not to sue B in the future for using any colorable imitation of A&#8217;s mark, and moves to dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice.  B, intent on pursuing its counterclaim, opposes the motion.  [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.pattishall.com&#038;blog=14106647&#038;post=1619&#038;subd=pattishall&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.pattishall.com/2013/01/11/air-force-1-trade-dress-dispute-held-moot-nike-wins-at-supreme-court-but-at-what-cost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/f6942e38b9535efb49140710f026d815?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">pattishall</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://pattishall.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/uw-lr.jpg?w=105" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">UW low res</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>When it Comes to Parody Twitter Accounts, Laughing Them Off May Be Your Best Move</title>
		<link>http://blog.pattishall.com/2012/11/27/when-it-comes-to-parody-twitter-accounts-laughing-them-off-may-be-your-best-move/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.pattishall.com/2012/11/27/when-it-comes-to-parody-twitter-accounts-laughing-them-off-may-be-your-best-move/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard &#38; Geraldson LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark (General)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew R. W. Hughes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times Is On It]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pattishall.com/?p=1603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Andrew R. W. Hughes The @NYTOnIt Twitter feed managed to draw more than 20,000 followers and accolades from Time magazine with its wry send-ups of New York Times trend pieces.  Whenever the New York Times published a story that Benjamin Kabak found obvious, pompous, or otherwise groan-inducing, he took to his @NYTOnIt Twitter handle [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.pattishall.com&#038;blog=14106647&#038;post=1603&#038;subd=pattishall&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.pattishall.com/2012/11/27/when-it-comes-to-parody-twitter-accounts-laughing-them-off-may-be-your-best-move/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/f6942e38b9535efb49140710f026d815?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">pattishall</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://pattishall.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/arh_lowres.jpg?w=100" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">arh_lowres</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://pattishall.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/times.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Times</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motley Crue Successfully Moves for Dismissal of Suit Involving Copyright in “Too Fast for Love” Album Artwork</title>
		<link>http://blog.pattishall.com/2012/10/15/motley-crue-successfully-moves-for-dismissal-of-suit-involving-copyright-in-too-fast-for-love-album-artwork/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.pattishall.com/2012/10/15/motley-crue-successfully-moves-for-dismissal-of-suit-involving-copyright-in-too-fast-for-love-album-artwork/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 16:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard &#38; Geraldson LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Album Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey A. Wakolbinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photograph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pattishall.com/?p=1593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Jeffrey A. Wakolbinger On October 9, 2012, Judge Grady, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, dismissed a copyright-infringement action against rock band Mötley Crüe for lack of personal jurisdiction.[1] The suit was brought by Ron Toma, who owns copyrights in certain photographs of band members Vince Neil, Nikki [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.pattishall.com&#038;blog=14106647&#038;post=1593&#038;subd=pattishall&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.pattishall.com/2012/10/15/motley-crue-successfully-moves-for-dismissal-of-suit-involving-copyright-in-too-fast-for-love-album-artwork/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/f6942e38b9535efb49140710f026d815?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">pattishall</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://pattishall.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/jaw-lr.jpg?w=105" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">JAW-LR</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://pattishall.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/motley-crue.jpg?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Motley Crue</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pattishall Client Prevails On Counterfeiting and Infringement Claims Over Marks for Vehicle Braking Systems; Court Awards Over $13 Million in Damages, Attorneys’ Fees, Costs and Sanctions</title>
		<link>http://blog.pattishall.com/2012/10/10/pattishall-client-prevails-on-counterfeiting-and-infringement-claims-over-marks-for-vehicle-braking-systems-court-awards-over-13-million-in-damages-attorneys-fees-costs-and-sanctions/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.pattishall.com/2012/10/10/pattishall-client-prevails-on-counterfeiting-and-infringement-claims-over-marks-for-vehicle-braking-systems-court-awards-over-13-million-in-damages-attorneys-fees-costs-and-sanctions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard &#38; Geraldson LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pattishall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark (General)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney's Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belinda J. Scrimenti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley L. Cohn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey A. Wakolbinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thad Chaloemtiarana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pattishall.com/?p=1586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pattishall client Robert Bosch LLC (“Bosch”) was awarded judgment of over $13 Million by default on its claims of counterfeiting, infringement, unfair competition, and false advertising after nearly three years of litigation and “extensive and cumbersome discovery” in Robert Bosch LLC v. A.B.S. Power Brake, Inc., Case No. 09-14468 (E.D. Mich. August 2, 2012).  Pattishall [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.pattishall.com&#038;blog=14106647&#038;post=1586&#038;subd=pattishall&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.pattishall.com/2012/10/10/pattishall-client-prevails-on-counterfeiting-and-infringement-claims-over-marks-for-vehicle-braking-systems-court-awards-over-13-million-in-damages-attorneys-fees-costs-and-sanctions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/f6942e38b9535efb49140710f026d815?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">pattishall</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICANN Seeks Comments On The Procedures To Be Used by the Trademark Clearinghouse In Connection With The Implementation of New gTLDs</title>
		<link>http://blog.pattishall.com/2012/10/01/icann-seeks-comments-on-the-procedures-to-be-used-by-the-trademark-clearinghouse-in-connection-with-the-implementation-of-new-gtlds/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.pattishall.com/2012/10/01/icann-seeks-comments-on-the-procedures-to-be-used-by-the-trademark-clearinghouse-in-connection-with-the-implementation-of-new-gtlds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard &#38; Geraldson LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new gTLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phillip Barengolts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Clearinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pattishall.com/?p=1577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Phillip Barengolts, Partner On September 24, 2012, ICANN requested comments on two important procedures in the implementation of the Trademark Clearinghouse[1] – proof of trademark use and determination of a match. http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-7-24sep12-en.htm.  The Trademark Clearinghouse will serve as a repository used by trademark owners to protect against the use of their marks for domain [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.pattishall.com&#038;blog=14106647&#038;post=1577&#038;subd=pattishall&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.pattishall.com/2012/10/01/icann-seeks-comments-on-the-procedures-to-be-used-by-the-trademark-clearinghouse-in-connection-with-the-implementation-of-new-gtlds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/f6942e38b9535efb49140710f026d815?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">pattishall</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://pattishall.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/pb_lowres.jpg?w=105" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">pb_lowres</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Publication of Noelia&#8217;s Secret Wedding Photos Not Fair Use, Ninth Circuit Finds</title>
		<link>http://blog.pattishall.com/2012/09/27/publication-of-noelias-secret-wedding-photos-not-fair-use-ninth-circuit-finds/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.pattishall.com/2012/09/27/publication-of-noelias-secret-wedding-photos-not-fair-use-ninth-circuit-finds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 21:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard &#38; Geraldson LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noelia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth I. Appel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pattishall.com/?p=1569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By: Seth I. Appel The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a gossip magazine&#8217;s publication of photographs of a secret celebrity wedding did not constitute fair use under the Copyright Act.  Monge v. Maya Magazines, Inc., 688 F.3d 1164 (9th Cir. Aug. 14, 2012). Noelia Lorenzo Monge, the Puerto Rican pop singer and model [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.pattishall.com&#038;blog=14106647&#038;post=1569&#038;subd=pattishall&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.pattishall.com/2012/09/27/publication-of-noelias-secret-wedding-photos-not-fair-use-ninth-circuit-finds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/f6942e38b9535efb49140710f026d815?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">pattishall</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://pattishall.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/sia-lr.jpg?w=100" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">SIA-LR</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
